10 Oct 2018 07:01:52
Thought press conference storm in teacup. He spoke candidly and may I say respectful of Gers. Wouldn't take him back not for PC but for fact he ain't good enough for SG revolution.

1.) 10 Oct 2018
10 Oct 2018 09:13:57
Storm in a teacup! He said rangers were dead.

2.) 10 Oct 2018
10 Oct 2018 10:16:55
I don't think he every said the words 'rangers are dead' i may be wrong, he did call us servco or something, but that was a dig at green not at rangers or the fans. The only thing I don't like is how he never moved his contract over with agreement we sold him then we could easily have sold him for something and it would have been no hard feelings for me anyway. The pfa told all players they could be free agents at this point. Not saying I want him back at all, but still looking for the comment rangers are dead.

3.) 10 Oct 2018
10 Oct 2018 11:07:35
He said rangers don’t exist in its original form, maybe didn’t use the exact words but that’s what it implies fintytint. for the record he has said he regrets the interview and to be honest I’d take him back.

4.) 10 Oct 2018
10 Oct 2018 11:33:35
Wouldn't have him back . The way he conducted himself showed his true character . He's not good enough now anyway .

5.) 10 Oct 2018
10 Oct 2018 11:42:28
What is all the clamour for him? Not good enough any more.

6.) 10 Oct 2018
10 Oct 2018 11:38:28
Not sticking up for him in any way at all, but imagine your boss asks you to take a 50% pay cut to save the company you work for, but a few months later liquidation happens. Wouldn't you be a bit miffed?

7.) 10 Oct 2018
10 Oct 2018 12:13:49
Again the comment i feel as i read it was an attack at green and from his own words the mystery men behind the deal. Then later on he says 'I hope it can turn back to the rangers that everyone knows' The use of the words he said the club was dead aren't helping. He takes swipes at Celtic at Green the men behind the scenes, but not at rangers, the fans or players. It just how I heard it. But my gripe is only with the fact he didn't move his contract over and allow us to sell him.

8.) 10 Oct 2018
10 Oct 2018 16:54:36
Wouldn't have mattered if we sold him the money wouldn't have went to club as white was stealing all the money.

9.) 10 Oct 2018
10 Oct 2018 17:18:27
If he moved his contract overdue wouldn't have got a good team like Everton to come in for him so stay warm 25 percent of what u where on or go and double what u where on the guy did nothing wrong and in saying that i'd say being him back as he would assist the boy the way he did boyd.

10.) 11 Oct 2018
11 Oct 2018 14:59:42
Marco C. if you had 2 serious illnesses and your company kept you on during these times when they could have got rid off you. and then asked you to take 50% pay cut, then went into liquidation but once in liquidation you knew you would still have a job in the same place but as a a different owner. the majority of people would feel like they owed it to the company who looked after them when they where at a bad time in their lifes.

11.) 11 Oct 2018
11 Oct 2018 17:17:59
No they wouldn't that's not really life, especially in football where player have maybe 20 years to make as much money as possible. Not sticking up for naismith but he had a contract it's not his fault he got injured, and he could have walked straight away instead of taking a 50%pay cut. End of the day he shouldn't come back as we can do better, no other reason.