18 Mar 2015 22:52:50
We need clarification on a lot of things
1. Why is McCoist still on gardening duty.
2. Why is McDowell on gardening duty.
3. Why are we paying the wages of the Newcastle players when its been made clear that they are not fit Newcastle must have known this.
4. Do McCulloch and Wallace have a must play clause in there contract.for stupid money and a % being passed on a n other
5. Show us the Title Deeds for Ibrox
The first 4 are a drain on our resources

1.) 19 Mar 2015
18 Mar 2015 23:10:01
Youl have to enlighten me m8, mcoist is on gardening leave as he is still in contract, and hasn't done anything to break that contract that we know,, I wasn't aware that McDowall was on gardening leave,, I also didn't know we were paying the loan players wages, that wouldn't be the usual thing, also the fact that most of them didn't appear or weren't fit for purpose would be enuf to cancel any contract IMO,, we will never know the details of confidential contracts,, the deeds I agree with, but that will have to come out eventually

2.) 19 Mar 2015
18 Mar 2015 23:14:07
Bongo,

totally agree, I would add we need to know why no NOMAD appointment yet and why was Easedale investigation stopped. I want to remain behind the new board but my concerns are growing.

Nick H.

3.) 19 Mar 2015
19 Mar 2015 00:36:17
Absolutely agree with your post. They must be wanting to keep Bomber quiet by putting him in directors box since he has said on numerous occasions that he knows stuff which means we don't own Ibrox yet there has been no transparency from the new regime. Better get their finger out

4.) 19 Mar 2015
19 Mar 2015 00:55:20
Because there is no rush if all the contracts have been drawn up legal and correctly then it would Require McCoist and McDowell to agree to rip them up. I doubt they are paying interest on the amount of outstanding notice he has left so why pay it as a lump sum in one go when you don't have to?

Same for number 3 and depends on the contract the previous board agreed to.

Off the pitch nothing is going to move very fast - you can't do a through investigation into all the previous deals and contracts over night nor do you want to default on a contract because you wrongly believe you can just walk away from it only to find you are wrong and face years of legal action and expense!

A lot of people may not like this but actually being promoted might even make it harder to stablise the none football side of the club and if promotion this season followed by a relegation next season ( based off the current performances!) would mean all the effort going into firefighting and no longer term stability planning.

The worst case scenario is it may be financially cheaper to just leave those contracts and Ashleys for the duration of those contracts.

5.) 19 Mar 2015
19 Mar 2015 07:58:09
get real the board are just in the door do u think they are not addressing these issues all these have been inherited and although they promised more transparency while negoitions are going on details can't be released don't forget macoist and macdowalls contracts were given out by green they can only be altered if macoist and macdowall agree as far as the newcastle players go we do not know if we are paying for them and do u for one minute think king and co would spend the amount of money without owning ibrox if I thought the board were not operating in the best interests of the club I would be the first to shout but honestly I don't know what some of u want in the short time they have been in power they have done a lot and probably a lot more than what is in the public domain they must be allowed to get on with running the buisness without stupid statements

6.) 19 Mar 2015
19 Mar 2015 08:26:51
Bongo re McCoist's gardening leave and £14,000 per week salary. It's a long time since I did my two years of Scot's law but I seem to remember from our basic text book "General Principles of Scot's Law" by Enid A Marshall something about consensus ad idem which translated to - there had to be agreement to the essentials of the contract before it was legal. Now if our Alistair, didn't as he claimed, read his contract and just signed it then perhaps that might be grounds for ripping it up. Of course we all realise he probably did read it particularly the bit with sterling amounts and it was only a less than impressive inaccuracy to defuse a slightly awkward question put to the "great one"

7.) 19 Mar 2015
19 Mar 2015 18:51:11
Mannering

He certainly did read his contract and he blatantly lied to the support claiming he just signed it. Nice way for a so called legend to treat the support

8.) 19 Mar 2015
19 Mar 2015 18:53:02
Big Wull
all I'm asking us an announcement that we are in control of the Title Deeds to Ibrox remember John Browns statement on the steps of Ibrox simple show us we have the title deeds, it's beyonpd me that no reporter has asked about them!