04 Mar 2024 09:09:48
I was one of the posters who was against the signing of Shankland ( because of his age ) but after watching him yesterday against Celtic he looked good, his positional sense was really good and in my opinion he scored two good goals.

1.) 04 Mar 2024
04 Mar 2024 09:15:53
No brainer for me 1 year left on his deal so hearts will be looking to sell too.

2.) 04 Mar 2024
04 Mar 2024 09:51:09
He's the best finisher in our league by a country mile, and would bang them in for fun for us. It's mental that some posters think differently?!

3.) 04 Mar 2024
04 Mar 2024 10:10:00
Juat as well we didn’t sign him otherwise we wouldn’t be top of league today.

4.) 04 Mar 2024
04 Mar 2024 10:48:22
Staunch. we would be top as we wouldn't have lost at the weekend and goal difference would look fake if Shanks played for Gers. Gers have missed loads of chances all season. One good game against Hearts doesn't prove otherwise.

However, maybe it was PC plan all along to leave Shankland at Hearts so that Hearts keep Celtic in check LOL.

5.) 04 Mar 2024
04 Mar 2024 11:23:16
Shankland half the price in summer, would love both him and Dhenky in summer, winning the league is huge money wise and would help the Boss put his own stamp on team.

6.) 04 Mar 2024
04 Mar 2024 12:16:51
At 29 years old and the money Hearts are after, he will not be at Rangers.
And statistically he misses as many chances as others in the league.
Unless he’s going to turn into Haaland or Kane if he pulls on the Rangers jersey?
I’m not fussed if he signs or not.

7.) 04 Mar 2024
04 Mar 2024 13:05:59
Here we go again, how do you know Shankland would score more for us. Hearts rarely have to go up against 10 men in the box. Rangers and Celtic have to week in and week out. How many times (outwith set pieces) did you see Shankland in their own last quarter defending?

Rangers have scored 64 goals so far, so by all Shankland supporters believe we would already be on 80 plus. would love to be but don't see it.

BTW i wouldn't object to him being a rangers player but i don't want us to sign a 29 year old striker as first option, then do you think he would come to us believing he wouldn't be first pick? don't think so.

8.) 04 Mar 2024
04 Mar 2024 13:10:59
Correct MPH
Also no one can say for any certain if we had shanks on sat we win as we don’t know what would have happened. wcoukd have signed him and he got injured in 1st game.

9.) 04 Mar 2024
04 Mar 2024 13:31:54
Hmmmmm?! Let me think? How do I know Shankland would score more for us? Because I have a brain! ?.

10.) 04 Mar 2024
04 Mar 2024 17:12:56
Who told you that, was it Jackthelad??.

11.) 04 Mar 2024
04 Mar 2024 19:30:56
He is of more benefit to us where he is. If he had been with us at the weekend there is certainly no guarantee that we would have won the game and who would have scored the Hearts goal.
He is a good striker, no doubt about that. It is up to our Scouts to identify younger better players, something that seldom happened under recent previous management.