17 Jan 2018 01:50:14
Naismith to Hearts on loan for the rest of the season. Knew it wouldn't be a full transfer at this stage, reportedly he wants 10k a week. Don't think Hearts could pay that tbh. Also makes me question where the papers got the 'playing for Rangers for free' story from? 🤔

Anybody that bothered about missing out on him? I always said Cummings preferable over Naismith personally. 10 years of a difference between them and Naismith is injury prone. We have enough injury prone players as it is.

That being said, it's a great signing for Hearts and will more than likely score against us, after all just about ever other ex-Ger this season has 😂.

1.) 17 Jan 2018
17 Jan 2018 06:08:42
Nope, he’s a rat.

2.) 17 Jan 2018
17 Jan 2018 06:39:19
Don’t know if he would have played for free but I think he’s a very good player on his day and would have taken him back.

3.) 17 Jan 2018
17 Jan 2018 07:26:33
Good riddance

4.) 17 Jan 2018
17 Jan 2018 08:52:13
I would have preferred him not to go to anyone else in Scotland as he will come back and haunt us no doubt just hope he haunts Celtic and Aberdeen more!

5.) 17 Jan 2018
17 Jan 2018 11:01:35
The 'play for free' thing was a complete tabloid fabrication. He said only that money wasn't an issue, and from that the red tops came up with a 'play for free' lie.

6.) 17 Jan 2018
17 Jan 2018 12:13:33
I would worry to much if Hearts sign Naismith, he'll end up with an injury, AGAIN!

7.) 17 Jan 2018
17 Jan 2018 12:47:58
Cummings is the man for me. Naismith will only sit on the hospital bed after a few matches

8.) 17 Jan 2018
17 Jan 2018 15:48:14
I for one am happy we did not sign Naismith. Cummings and Murphy better deals in my opinion.
As I've said before I have no axe to grind, he is a good man whose Loaves and Fishes charity proves. Good luck young man.