26 Apr 2017 09:45:11
Former player Kyle Lafferty says he would jump at the chance to rejoin rangers

1.) 26 Apr 2017
26 Apr 2017 10:35:20
Not this rubbish again.

2.) 26 Apr 2017
26 Apr 2017 10:37:40
So he keeps saying, we need better than a player who struggles for form all season until the last 4 or 5 games.

3.) 26 Apr 2017
26 Apr 2017 12:02:34
Id take Lafferty back in a sec, put all the rubbish to 1 side for a moment abt what was said and done 5yr ago, he's far better than what we've got and same goes for Naismith. Rangers being successful means more to me than anything and in signing these 2,i think that would be a start. they also know what it takes to be a winner

4.) 26 Apr 2017
26 Apr 2017 12:23:54
Agree with you completely jls, miles better than both garner and waghorn, and to get on a free would be good, as long as his wage demands weren't too high

5.) 26 Apr 2017
26 Apr 2017 12:52:55
He's available on a free and to be honest he's record up here speaks for itself and he's improved his game since he was last at Rangers albeit playing with better players around him.

if we manage to get 1.5 million between selling Garner and Waghorn then i'd definitely be in favor of taking on lafferty on a free with another striker/ attacker to come in obviously of better quality than the 2 we are selling, personal choice again would be Weiss!

Waggy scored for fun last year but again its safe to say that was his level, Lafferty has proved he can score in the SPL and at the most crucical times of the season as well!

6.) 26 Apr 2017
26 Apr 2017 12:54:57
Its 4 or 5 good games more than Waghorn and Garner give us

7.) 26 Apr 2017
26 Apr 2017 13:41:59
No chance of getting Naismith glad after all the sevco pish he spouted at that press conference that I can't forgive

8.) 26 Apr 2017
26 Apr 2017 13:53:37
I would happily take these two back. If they want to show the fans they regret what happened then sign a contract worth 2k a week! Play for the jersey not the money. that will show how much they want to come back!

9.) 26 Apr 2017
26 Apr 2017 14:22:02
honestly, i am fed up hearing about the old days.
id take naismith back and without hesitation alan mcgregor.
both are international level players, and without shadow of a doubt better than our current championship team.
if they want to come back and we can offer a wage that works for both party, then why not?
someone on here said before - these guys don't have 40 or 50 year careers, and if someone can't guarantee that they will be working or paid next month then i'd be on my out the door too. yeah some things were said in the heat of the moment - but we've all done that.
we need all the help we can get - building a team on the park that can challenge rivals. they did it before, heres hoping they would like to do it again.

10.) 26 Apr 2017
26 Apr 2017 15:36:10
Lafferty is by no means a great player but when compared to Waghorn and Garner i'd still rather have him

11.) 26 Apr 2017
26 Apr 2017 15:46:35
course he would but we need better than him he is an awfull player and was a disgrace to the badge the last time.
i don't care he left when he did i don't blame anyone for that but laffetry is mince

12.) 26 Apr 2017
26 Apr 2017 15:49:34
He wasnt one of the 28 who ran away and he would be better than we have provided he is fit.

13.) 26 Apr 2017
26 Apr 2017 15:53:08
He's better than garner and waghorn but that doesn't mean we should sign him. Apart from his northern ireland record his goal record is rubbish. He only wants to come back now we've done the hard bit and got through the divisions. I'd maybe just have naismith back, and would like dorrans. The only two norwich players we should be targeting

14.) 26 Apr 2017
26 Apr 2017 16:05:35
course he would but we need better than him he is an awfull player and was a disgrace to the badge the last time.
i don't care he left when he did i don't blame anyone for that but laffetry is mince

15.) 26 Apr 2017
26 Apr 2017 16:06:34
He wasnt one of the 28 who ran away and he woild be better than we have provided he is fit.

16.) 26 Apr 2017
26 Apr 2017 16:09:38
How no chance on getting naismith? Some people have claimed it's already a done deal? So what makes you so certain?

17.) 26 Apr 2017
26 Apr 2017 16:11:10
Marty, do you not think it is a backward step taking players who will not have a sell on value, but will command sizeable wages? That was the problem under Murray, for the most part at least. Personally, I would prefer to develop players and hopefully sell on with a decent profit.

18.) 26 Apr 2017
26 Apr 2017 16:28:50
We need someone who is fast and can find the net, our strikers are as slow as a week in the jail 😂

19.) 26 Apr 2017
26 Apr 2017 16:44:41
Cuillin,
I don't think it is - maybe if all we do is sign 30 year old players then yeah, but experience is essetnial on and off the park - especially for bringing the youngsters on. if i was a young rangers player and i thought that i could be lining up on the team sheet besides the likes of naismith, or mcgregor, or bougherra, or whoever - i'd be excited and wanting to show what i can do, praise from people like (people they used to support and idolise) that brings confidence. if they were gona be your team mate. i'd play out my skin for that chance - that's the fight we need.

20.) 27 Apr 2017
27 Apr 2017 13:22:28
i would like to say to all you haters of all the people that left 5 years ago when they had little choice about it i wouldn't stay at my job for 25 percent of what i'm earning just now and i love my job .

most of you lot sing about king kenny but are quick to forget about him kissing the celtic badge when he scored against us and can forgive all of that but draw the line at people not taking a wage cut and playing their best years in the bottom of scottish football.

p.s. i don't care that kenny did that either just putting it out there to all the people out there that think that way.

21.) 27 Apr 2017
27 Apr 2017 17:37:49
Certainly Naismith has 2 years left on his contract would cost too much I don't want him anywhere old days it was only 5 year ago he started sevco pish